Language: English | Indonesian | 日本語 | Tagalog | Tiếng Việt
Upload photo Show recent photos
Upload video Show recent videos
Submit new post Show recent posts
Start a new group
My page My account My picture Change password



Signup

Aral Sea Destruction

BBC:The Aral Sea lies on the border between the former Soviet republics of Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, but the waters which feed it rise thousands of kilometres away in the Pamir Mountains. The great Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers were known in history as the Oxus and Jaxartes. They flow through much of Central Asia before they reach the Aral. Along the way much of their water is taken for the irrigation of thirsty cotton crops. Large scale irrigation began in the 1960s and has led to the Aral losing half its area and three-quarters of its volume. Former fishing villages are now dozens of kilometres away from the shoreline. Trade and Environmen Database As the twentieth century began, irrigated agriculture in the basin was still being conducted at a sustainable level. After the Russian Empire was replaced by the Soviet Union, this began to change. Traditional agricultural practices were destroyed by collectivization, and Soviet planners sought products that could be exported for hard currency. They placed cotton high on their list, calling it `white gold,' and the Soviet Union became a net exporter of cotton in 1937. Change accelerated in the 1950s, as Central Asian irrigated agriculture was expanded and mechanized. The Kara Kum Canal opened in 1956, diverting large amounts of water from the Amu Darya into the desert of Turkmenistan, and millions of hectares of land came under irrigation after 1960. A crucial juncture had been reached, and after 1960 the level of the Aral Sea began to drop, while diversion of water continued to increase. While the sea had been receiving about fifty cubic kilometers of water per year in 1965, by the early 1980s this had fallen to zero. As the Aral shrank, its salinity increased, and by 1977 the formerly large fish catch had declined by over seventy-five percent. By the early 1980s, commercially useful fish had been eliminated, shutting down an industry that had employed 60,000. The declining sea level lowered the water table in the region, destroying many oases near its shores. Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF):The environmental impact resulting from the desiccation of the Aral Sea, coupled with worsening poverty and a general deterioration of health services, has exposed the population living in and around the Aral Sea area to an unprecedented humanitarian and health crisis. The Aral Sea area programme, covering Khorezm and Karakalpakstan in Uzbekistan, and Dashoguz in Turkmenistan, is a humanitarian attempt to improve the health of a population that bears witness to high rates of tuberculosis and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. MSF also initiates research into the diseases and conditions associated with one of the worst environmental disasters in history. posted to . at Wed Jul 30 21:57:00 EDT 2003 by david.

Comments


david
BBC: An ambitious plan to try to restore to health part of the shrinking Aral Sea has been mounted by Kazakhstan. It involves building a massive dam to separate for ever the two distinct parts into which the sea has now split. But the project has a serious downside: if it succeeds, it means the virtual abandonment of any hope of restoring the sea's far bigger southern section.
posted to Aral Sea Destruction. at Sun Nov 02 14:03:04 EST 2003.
Reply
I am deeply concerned that this could easily happen to Michigan. Our legislators don't see that it is necessary to protect the Great Lakes from bulk extractions and diversions. Our governor is trying to gain support for the Great Lakes Legacy act and our republican senators think that more data needs to be collected. The Aral Sea tragety is quite capable of being repeated in other regions of the globe unless awareness is raised.

(Posted by guest: Mary C. LaFrance)
posted to Aral Sea Destruction. at Thu Oct 28 16:32:15 EDT 2004.
Reply
i am from michigan, and i agree with you. do they not see the problems that the asian goverment are having with the aral sea? ist the same as 911. they had no security in our air ports, even though they knew that our country has many people who dont like us, then 911 happened and all the sudden they put the us army in every air port in america(ok mabey not the army) they cant seem to take a hint.

(Posted by guest: megan)
posted to Aral Sea not so different from Great Lakes Region. at Tue Mar 08 03:20:50 EST 2005.
Reply
I have to say that although the dam may spell certain doom for the southern half, it is better to have perserved part than non at all. So I believe in what Kazakhstan is trying to do - something that Uzbekistan has done little to prevent first out of the restrictions of the former Soviet era and now fro monetary reasons. We, the rest of the world also have a certain obligation here - we are ONE earth - borders and countries are artificial. What affects one - affects us all.

(Posted by guest: Alison)
posted to Aral Sea Destruction. at Thu Dec 30 20:31:32 EST 2004.
Reply
I grew up in an agricultural region that is entirely dependent on irrigation. Tulare Lake used to be the largest fresh water lake in North America west of the great lakes. It is now completely gone, due to diversion of water for irrigation. Owens lake completely disappeared due to diversions by the city of Los Angeles. Mono lake was on a similar path until enviornmental activists, through legal action, forced Los Angeles to use alternate sources. In arid regions, agriculture can flourish, but only with judicious use of water. Greater than 99% of the natural habitat of the San Joaquin valley is gone forever. Environmental destruction was so complete and so rapid that no living memory can recollect what the prehistoric environment looked like. Some restoration has now been reattempted to the north, near Los Banos and Gustine, and migratory bird populations and some native plant species have come back. The lessons learned are that environmental destruction can be extremeley rapid, but also, that it can be reversed if the political will is present. Mono Lake was once considered beyond saving and now it's water level is back to historical levels. Also, even with 99% destruction, a limited recovery with reduced species diversity is possible on a fraction of the former area. Complete reversion to historical practices or Sustainability is not a prerequisite for significant environmental recovery. Every little bit helps.

(Posted by guest: Paul Forbes)
posted to Aral Sea Destruction. at Wed Feb 09 00:42:46 EST 2005.
Reply
It's all very well saying we must protect the interests of the agriculture and the cotton farmers but what about the people living around the Aral sea. What about their desperate living standards, hunger/starvation, spread of disease, high infant mortalitly and unsafe drinking water why shouldn't we help these peopl?. we must think about some short term issues like giving more aid to these people and also what is going to happen in the future when there is no sea at all- this whole issue has not nearly as much attention as it requires and is an attempt by the world to frogett these people, maybe Russia should help more in clearing up the trail of destruction it left

(Posted by guest: Jennie)
posted to Aral Sea Destruction. at Tue May 03 20:08:18 EDT 2005.
Reply
Add: Photo | Video | New Post
View: Recent Photos | Recent Videos | Recent Posts | My Page | My Account

Global Coordinate ©2008 All rights reserved.